For a lot of months, consultants have warned that COVID-19 is just not a lot a viral pandemic because it is a “casedemic” — a pandemic of false optimistic exams — and the factor that saved the fraud going was the truth that laboratories had been utilizing excessively excessive cycle thresholds (CTs) when processing the PCR exams.1
I detailed this scheme in “COVID-19 Testing Scandal Deepens” and “Astonishing COVID-19 Testing Fraud Revealed.” Exams really helpful by the World Well being Group had been initially set to 45 CTs,2,3,4 and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention advocate a CT of 40,5 but the scientific consensus has lengthy been that something over 35 CTs renders the check ineffective,6,7,8 because the accuracy will likely be a measly 3%. The rest, 97%, are false positives.9
In addition to artificially driving up the case charge, the PCR check fraud additionally fueled the parable that asymptomatic folks posed a possible well being risk, and due to this fact companies needed to shut down and everybody needed to keep at residence and self-quarantine.
January 20, 2021, the day of Joe Biden’s inauguration because the forty sixth president of the USA, the WHO instantly lowered the really helpful CT,10 thereby guaranteeing that the variety of “instances,” i.e., optimistic PCR check outcomes, would plummet.
Now, the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention has lowered the CT even additional, in what seems to be a transparent effort to cover COVID-19 breakthrough instances, that means instances in which absolutely vaccinated people are being identified with COVID-19.
How the CDC Is Overlaying Up Breakthrough Circumstances
As a part of its COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation, the CDC has issued pointers11 for public well being, medical and reference laboratories on the best way to check and diagnose instances the place absolutely vaccinated people are suspected of getting contracted COVID-19. In these pointers, it specifies utilizing a CT worth of 28 or much less.
So, in different phrases, whereas wholesome folks have, for the previous yr, been misdiagnosed as having COVID-19 after they actually didn’t as a result of the CT was set to 40 or 45, they’re now making an attempt to attenuate the recorded variety of breakthrough instances by utilizing a CT that may decrease false positives.12
Had a CT of 28 been used all alongside, we might have had nowhere close to the variety of “instances” at present touted and the pandemic would have been declared over someday in 2020. Conversely, had been a CT of 40 or 45 used to diagnose breakthrough instances, you may be certain the numbers could be far greater than at present reported.
Reported Breakthrough Circumstances Are Undercounted
As of April 26, 2021, the CDC had obtained a complete of 9,245 studies of vaccine breakthrough infections through its nationwide COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough REDCap database, into which state well being division investigators can enter and handle information from their respective jurisdictions.13
Of these 9,245 breakthrough instances, 55% had been underneath the age of 60, 835 required hospitalization (9%) and 132 died (1%). With an estimated 95 million People having been vaccinated, the reported breakthrough charge is barely 0.0097%. Nonetheless, the CDC additionally stresses that:14
“It is very important word that reported vaccine breakthrough instances will symbolize an undercount. This surveillance system is passive and depends on voluntary reporting from state well being departments which might not be full. Additionally, not all real-world breakthrough instances will likely be recognized due to lack of testing.”
COVID-19 Vaccine Facet Results Are Underreported Too
That is price retaining in thoughts, as the identical applies to reported COVID-19 vaccine negative effects, which as of April 23, 2021, included a complete of 118,902 adversarial occasions, 12,618 of which had been critical and three,544 of which died.15
As tragic as these numbers are, these too symbolize an undercount, because the U.S. vaccine adversarial occasion reporting system (VAERS) is a passive surveillance system that depends on voluntary reporting. Traditionally, lower than 10% of vaccine negative effects are reported to VAERS.16 An investigation by the U.S. Division of Well being and Human Providers put it as little as 1%.17,18
What this implies is negative effects may very well be 10 instances and even 100 instances greater than reported. We may, in actuality, be wherever from 126,000 to 1.2 million critical negative effects, and wherever from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths.
Proper now, it’s additionally tough to get an correct thought of the place we’re with regard to negative effects as VAERS seems to be backlogged for months. On Twitter, Alex Berenson19 famous that it had taken till the tip of April for the CDC to answer a report from January, which signifies the information you see on VAERS doesn’t mirror the true, real-time numbers of adversarial reactions being reported.
That is essential to know, because the system’s main objective is to “detect new, uncommon or uncommon vaccine adversarial occasions” as a approach to monitor security of vaccines. A backlog by months signifies that, fairly probably, there are such a lot of studies coming in that that the CDC can’t deal with them.
Uncommon however critical negative effects could also be occurring however we simply can’t see the development as a result of the information isn’t displaying, and the longer the backlog, the extra folks will likely be uncovered to a probably harmful vaccine.
Why Are Hundreds of Deaths Ignored?
In an interview with journalist Alex Newman (video above), Dr. Peter McCullough said he believes the federal government’s response to the pandemic has resulted in tens of hundreds of pointless deaths, and the mass vaccination program is now inflicting hundreds extra and they’re simply letting it occur.
He’s baffled on the authorities’s nonexistent response to the hundreds of deaths already logged into VAERS, noting that the 1976 swine flu pandemic mass vaccination program was pulled after simply 25 deaths and some hundred instances of paralysis. Medication are additionally yanked from the market at round 50 unexplained deaths.
On common, there are 20 to 30 deaths reported following the seasonal flu vaccine, which is given to about 195 million People annually.20 Evaluate that to the COVID-19 vaccines. At 95 million vaccinations administered, the dying rely is already at 3,542, the best for any vaccine in historical past. The distinction in response is “alarming,” McCullough says.
Much more regarding, after reviewing 1,600 of those deaths, the FDA declared not a single dying was associated to the vaccine. McCullough doesn’t imagine it, as a result of he is aware of from first-hand expertise it will take months to analyze that many deaths.
“It’s unattainable for unnamed regulatory medical doctors with none expertise with COVID 19 to opine that not one of the deaths had been associated to the vaccine,” he says. “We’re sitting on, proper now, the most important variety of vaccine deaths, there’s been tens of hundreds of hospitalizations, all attributable to the vaccine, and going robust …
In my skilled opinion, the most secure vaccine in the marketplace was the J&J vaccine. And that was pulled for very uncommon blood-clotting occasions. We had seven million folks vaccinated however the estimates are for the opposite two vaccines obtainable [Pfizer and Moderna], the blood-clotting charges are in all probability 30 instances that of J&J, and these others are going robust.”
Lively Vaccine Surveillance Months Away From Implementation
The FDA has additionally admitted that its evaluation of vaccine security information will likely be delayed for weeks, if not months, because of the pandemic hitting proper as they had been transitioning away from its Publish-Licensure Fast Immunization Security Monitoring (PRISM) community, which was used to trace negative effects from the pandemic H1N1 vaccine, into a brand new system known as the Biologics Effectiveness and Security System (BEST).
Utilizing a patchwork of passive reporting programs slightly than one complete, lively and central one, might in the end show disastrous. As reported by Kaiser Well being Information:21
“Probably harmful, unanticipated reactions to vaccines might not be so apparent in VAERS, a system that’s believed to overlook many potential negative effects — or within the nation’s extra monitoring programs, together with the Vaccine Security Datalink and the CDC’s new phone-based monitoring program, v-safe.
‘It’s fairly a hodgepodge of various programs of amassing information,’ mentioned Dr. Katherine Yih, a biologist and epidemiologist who makes a speciality of vaccine surveillance at Harvard Pilgrim Well being Care …
The Vaccine Security Datalink, although extremely regarded, didn’t embody sufficient vaccinations inside its information from 9 hospital programs masking 12 million folks to catch the J&J concern, CDC officers mentioned.
And enrollment in v-safe has been lower than anticipated, with about 6 million folks enrolled by the tip of March, simply 6.4% of those that had been vaccinated at that time.
That signifies that, at a time when about 100 million People have been absolutely vaccinated in opposition to COVID-19, the U.S. continues to depend on a patchwork community of vaccine monitoring programs that will fail to observe a big sufficient swath of the inhabitants, consultants informed KHN …
PRISM, which was repurposed for drug security … has not been used to trace vaccine reactions in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, mentioned [former director of vaccine safety at the National Vaccine Program Office, Daniel] Salmon, who oversaw security monitoring for the H1N1 vaccine. ‘With PRISM, we examined it in a disaster and it operated for a decade … I used to be actually shocked when it wasn’t used for COVID-19. That was why we constructed it’ …
FDA officers mentioned PRISM’s capabilities have been included into BEST, which might study information from 100 million folks. Specialists informed KHN that it has not been used extensively to observe post-vaccination results, however [FDA spokesperson Abby] Capobianco mentioned: ‘We disagree. BEST is constructed as a state-of-the-art lively surveillance system’ …
The priority is that officers have leaned closely on VAERS, a ‘passive’ system that depends on studies from sufferers and well being care suppliers to flag points after vaccination that will or might not be associated to the photographs. A sturdy ‘lively’ surveillance system can search giant volumes of affected person care information to match charges of adversarial occasions in individuals who obtained vaccines with these who didn’t.”
CDC Ignores Reviews of Critical Adversarial Results
Getting again to the CDC, it has additionally determined it can now not monitor all reported vaccine breakthrough instances (maybe as a result of they’re overloaded with studies of facet results?) and can solely examine vaccine breakthrough infections that lead to hospitalization or dying.22
Latest complaints from medical professionals elevate questions concerning the CDC’s means to do even that a part of the job.
As reported by Overview Journal,23,24 the medical group that handled an 18-year-old lady admitted for blood clots in the mind, low platelet rely and different indicators of a uncommon blood clotting dysfunction shortly after receiving Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 injection, “urgently sought steerage” from the CDC, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and Johnson & Johnson for concepts on the best way to finest deal with their younger affected person.
Their inquiries and pleas for assist had been ignored throughout. The FDA “mainly hung up on me,” Dr. Brian Lipman informed Overview Journal, including, “We mainly bought no assist from anybody.” It took greater than per week earlier than the CDC even bought round to calling again. That’s hardly what you’d count on from the world’s most preeminent infectious illness consultants once you’re coping with an acutely life-threatening case.
Guidelines for COVID-19 Loss of life Reporting Modifications Once more
Indicators that different international locations are additionally beginning to manipulate information in methods that may decrease vaccine failure charges may be seen in the U.Ok.’s choice to drop its rule that anybody having examined optimistic for SARS-CoV-2 inside 28 days of dying are to be counted as a COVID-19 dying.
Now that vaccines are out, COVID-19 is barely to be listed as the reason for dying if the affected person really died from an lively case of COVID-19 and nothing else. The hypocrisy is nothing if not predictable at this level. As reported by iNews:25
“The each day tally of coronavirus deaths inside 28 days of a optimistic check is probably going to be dropped after scientific advisers warned the Authorities it can change into an more and more inaccurate measure of the pandemic and vaccine success.
The modelling sub-group of the Authorities’s scientific advisory committee Sage says that the 28-day definition was helpful earlier than widespread vaccination, as a result of deaths in hospital inside a month of a optimistic check had been most certainly as a consequence of COVID-19.
Nonetheless now that tens of tens of millions of the UK inhabitants have obtained their jabs, deaths from different causes may nonetheless present up within the each day information if they’ve beforehand examined optimistic for coronavirus.
A senior Sage supply mentioned: ‘If the definition stays the identical, these folks could be counted as ‘vaccine failures’, whereas the vaccine prevented dying from COVID, however they actually died from one thing else.’”
Compensation for COVID-19 Vaccine Damage Is Restricted
In closing, it’s additionally price remembering that every one who’re injured by the COVID-19 “vaccines” are left to fend for themselves financially.
Not solely did they volunteer to be guinea pigs for an experimental gene remedy — which is what you’re doing if you happen to get these “vaccines” now, because the research are almost two years out from being accomplished and the injections solely have emergency use authorization — they’re additionally financially chargeable for any and all medical consideration they could want as a results of their generosity.
Should you determine to take part in this experiment and are injured, you possibly can attempt to apply for compensation from the Countermeasures Damage Compensation Act (CICP), underneath which COVID-19 “vaccines” are a coated countermeasure.26
You can not apply for and can not obtain compensation from the Nationwide Vaccine Damage Compensation Program (VICP), which covers different vaccines, together with the flu vaccine. You additionally can’t sue the vaccine producer, the federal government, your physician or anybody else concerned within the manufacturing, distributing or administering of COVID-19 vaccines, as they’ve particular legal responsibility protections underneath the PREP Act.
Nonetheless, remember that compensation from CICP could be very restricted, and solely applies in instances of great damage requiring hospitalization and leading to important incapacity and/or dying. And, even if you happen to meet the eligibility standards, it requires you to make use of up your non-public medical insurance earlier than it kicks in to pay the distinction.
You have to additionally file a request for advantages inside one yr of the date the vaccine was administered, and it is your duty to show your damage was the “direct results of the countermeasure’s administration primarily based on compelling, dependable, legitimate, medical and scientific proof past mere temporal affiliation. In different phrases, you should show what the vaccine developer has but to establish, seeing the way you are a part of their still-ongoing examine. Good luck.
Further particulars and hyperlinks to learn request kinds may be discovered within the Congressional Analysis Service’s authorized sidebar, “Compensation Applications for Potential COVID-19 Vaccine Accidents.”27